Court rules inbounds avalanches are inherent risk of Colorado skiing |

Court rules inbounds avalanches are inherent risk of Colorado skiing

Christopher Norris, 28, died in an inbounds avalanche while skiing on the Mary Jane side of Winter Park in 2012.

Avalanches within the boundaries of open runs at Colorado ski resorts are an inherent danger, and operators do not have to warn skiers or close runs, even when risk is high, the Colorado Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.

The 2-1 decision, which immunizes resorts from claims after avalanche-related deaths or injuries, is the first of its kind in the country, said Jim Chalat, a Colorado ski attorney. He said the decision is likely to influence courts in other states with similar ski-safety laws.

“There hasn’t been a prior case where an avalanche (on an open run) is considered a statutory inherent risk of skiing,” said Chalat, who has practiced ski law for more than three decades.

While the Colorado ski-safety act — which spells out responsibilities for skiers and snowboarders and grants immunity to ski operators from “inherent dangers” of the sport — does not specifically refer to avalanches, it does include changing snow and weather conditions.

“An avalanche is itself a danger resulting from certain conditions of snow, and the degree of danger is affected by ‘changing weather conditions’ across ‘variations of steepness and terrain,’ “ the majority wrote. “We thus construe the definition of inherent dangers and risks of skiing … to include an avalanche.”

“If the General Assembly wishes to hold ski areas accountable for avalanche-related injuries or deaths,” the judges wrote, “it should amend the act.”

The ruling, which is expected to be appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court, follows increased avalanche warnings in the state this week and the deaths of two people in backcountry avalanches.

The wrongful-death suit was brought by the wife of Christopher Norris, a 28-year-old who died in an inbounds avalanche in Winter Park’s Trestle Trees in 2012. The morning of the day that the father of two died, the Colorado Avalanche Information Center warned of “widespread dangerous avalanche conditions” and recommended that skiers and snowboarders “enjoy the powder in the safety of the ski area.”

His wife, Salyndra Fleury, argued that the ski area was aware of danger warnings and “knew or should have known” that the tree area was unsafe. But Grand County District Court Judge Mary C. Hoak ruled the resort wasn’t required to post warning signs or close the run. Avalanches, she said, are an inherent danger of skiing. The appellate court upheld her decision.

Winter Park representatives declined to comment.

Read this entire story, “Court rules inbounds avalanches are inherent risk of Colorado skiing,” at The Denver Post

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

The Sky-Hi News strives to deliver powerful stories that spark emotion and focus on the place we live.

Over the past year, contributions from readers like you helped to fund some of our most important reporting, including coverage of the East Troublesome Fire.

If you value local journalism, consider making a contribution to our newsroom in support of the work we do.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User