William Hamilton: Bhutto’s assassination: A deal killer
Here was the “deal.”
1. The recent re-election of pro-Western, Pakistani president, Pervez Musharraf, would be validated by the Pakistani Supreme Court.
2. Musharraf would step down as head of Pakistan’s armed forces in favor of pro-Western General Ashfaq Kayani.
3. Musharraf and Kayani would continue the U.S. funded, $100 million program that keeps Pakistan’s nuclear weapons out of the hands of al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
4. Former prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, would be forgiven previous corruption charges and allowed to return home.
5. Mrs. Bhutto, as head of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPK), would be elected to parliament this January, resume her role as Prime Minister, and try to propel Pakistan along a path to some form of democracy, albeit not Jeffersonian.
Here is what happened: The Musharraf-packed Supreme Court validated the pro-Western Musharraf’s re-election. The pro-Western General Kayani took over the armed forces from Musharraf. The joint Pakistani/U.S. nuclear-weapons custody program remained in place. So far, so good.
But, on Dec. 27, 2007, Mrs. Bhutto was assassinated by radical Islamists who did not want her to lead Pakistan toward democracy. For the radical Islamic terrorists, the assassination of Mrs. Bhutto was the essence of logic because democracy would have stood in the way of what the radical Islamists want to do: Take over the only Muslim country that has nuclear weapons.
Earlier, the radical Islamists thought they could take over Iraq, reconstitute Saddam Hussein’s former nuclear-weapons program and have all the benefits of being a nuclear-armed, nation-state instead of just being a bunch of bomb-making, religious zealots bumping across the deserts in aging Toyota pick-ups.
Despite sabotage by the anti-American Left, the success of the surge suggests that Iraq isn’t likely to fall to the radical Islamists anytime soon. At least not until after Nov. 4, 2008. And, maybe, not even then.
That put Mrs. Bhutto squarely in the sights of the radical Islamists.
Because the joint PPK-U.S.-Pakistani Grand Strategy is now in disarray. The January 2008 elections will likely be postponed to March 2008, or later. Until inflamed passions cool, a period of martial law is also likely.
Meanwhile, the government of nuclear-armed India is watching all these events with a heightened level of concern. India and Pakistan exist, side-by-side, in a state of nuclear, mutually-assured destruction ” like two scorpions in a bottle.
At the same time, Iran is taking a logical step toward the possession of its own nuclear weapons. The first logical step is to create an effective air-defense system around what are almost surely to be their nuclear-weapons sites.
Recall, that former Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev took the logical first step of installing air-defense missile batteries (SAMs) around the places in Cuba where he planned to install missiles that could reach the key population centers of the United States. But, before the SAM sites were operational, U.S. spy cameras caught them on film. When President John F. Kennedy signaled his willingness to invade Cuba, Khrushchev abandoned his plan.
Fast forward. Iran just struck a deal with Russia to purchase a state-of-the-art air defense system.
Why? Because Iran must be planning on creating some high-value targets that need air-defense protection. The only targets of high value to Israel or the United States would have to be nuclear-weapons sites.
The Iranian-Russian deal, a la the Cuban Missile Crisis, increases the likelihood that Israel and/or the United States will destroy Iran’s nascent nuclear capabilities.
If President Bush thinks a Democrat will win the White House, it is conceivable that John F. Kennedy will serve as a role model for President Bush before he leaves office. If the Iranian Mullahs won’t do a Nikita Khrushchev, George W. Bush may go beyond John F Kennedy and do a Harry S. Truman.
Meanwhile, lest he suffer Mrs. Bhutto’s fate, President Musharraf would be well-advised to oust the jihadist rogues within his own government and allow U.S./NATO forces free reign to chase the Taliban and al-Qaeda back into Afghanistan.
” Syndicated columnist and featured commentator for USA Today, Grand County resident William Hamilton, is a Distinguished Graduate of the U.S. Naval War College and a former research fellow at the U.S. Military History Institute of the U.S. Army War College. He is a member of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Grand County make the Sky-Hi News' work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User